Skip to main content

RBT Session Notes: Examples, Templates & Best Practices for ABA Documentation

Index​

Session notes are the most frequent documentation task in ABA therapy—and the one where documentation errors have the biggest impact. According to industry data, documentation errors account for up to 42% of ABA claim denials. That means nearly half of all denied claims could be prevented with better session note practices.

As an RBT, you'll complete session notes after every client interaction. With caseloads of 5-8 clients per day, that's potentially 40+ session notes per week. Each note must be accurate, objective, compliant with payer requirements, and completed within tight timeframes—typically within 24 hours of the session. The pressure is real.

This guide provides everything you need to master RBT session notes: formats, examples, templates, and strategies for avoiding the errors that trigger claim denials. Whether you're a new RBT learning documentation basics or an experienced technician looking to improve efficiency, you'll find actionable guidance to elevate your session note quality.

Documentation Burden in ABA

The administrative demands of ABA documentation contribute significantly to burnout rates in the field. While session notes are essential, the time they consume often extends beyond paid hours. Practices are increasingly exploring tools to streamline documentation—from templates to AI-powered form automation that can pre-populate client information and treatment plan data into session note templates.

Why Session Notes Matter​

Before diving into how to write session notes, it's worth understanding why they matter beyond "because we have to."

Clinical Purpose​

Session notes create the ongoing clinical record of each client's treatment journey:

Continuity of care: When you're absent or when clients transition to new RBTs, session notes allow anyone to understand what happened, what's working, and what needs attention.

Data-driven decision making: ABA is fundamentally data-driven. Session notes provide the quantitative and qualitative information BCBAs need to evaluate interventions and make adjustments.

Progress tracking: Over weeks and months, session notes document the trajectory of skill acquisition and behavior change—essential for treatment plan updates and reauthorization.

Session notes serve as the legal record of services provided:

Billing substantiation: Every unit billed must be supported by corresponding documentation. Session notes prove that services occurred as claimed.

Audit protection: In the event of a payer audit, session notes are your primary evidence that services were delivered appropriately.

Professional accountability: If ethical complaints or legal issues arise, session notes document your adherence to the treatment plan and professional standards.

Insurance Reimbursement​

Without proper session notes, claims will be denied:

Medical necessity: Notes must demonstrate that each session addressed specific treatment plan goals and functional deficits.

Service verification: Notes confirm who provided services, when, where, and for how long.

Treatment fidelity: Notes show that services were delivered according to the authorized treatment plan.

Session Note Formats​

Several standardized formats exist for ABA session notes. Your organization likely mandates a specific format, but understanding the options helps you capture information appropriately regardless of structure.

SOAP Notes​

The SOAP format—Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan—comes from the medical model and provides a familiar structure for healthcare documentation:

  • Subjective: Information reported by others (caregivers, teachers, client)
  • Objective: Observable, measurable data and behaviors
  • Assessment: Clinical interpretation of the data
  • Plan: Next steps and modifications

SOAP works well for ABA because it clearly separates observation from interpretation and always ends with forward-looking planning.

BIRP Notes​

The BIRP format—Behavior, Intervention, Response, Plan—is particularly well-suited to ABA because it emphasizes the behavior-intervention relationship:

  • Behavior: What the client did (both target behaviors and challenging behaviors)
  • Intervention: What strategies and techniques you implemented
  • Response: How the client responded to interventions (including data)
  • Plan: Next steps and modifications

BIRP makes the ABA three-term contingency (antecedent-behavior-consequence) visible in documentation.

DAP Notes​

The DAP format—Data, Assessment, Plan—provides a streamlined structure:

  • Data: Objective information including session data
  • Assessment: Interpretation and progress analysis
  • Plan: Future directions

DAP works well for efficient documentation when the subjective/objective distinction isn't critical.

Narrative Format​

Some organizations use flexible narrative formats that allow description in paragraph form while ensuring all essential elements are included. Narrative notes require discipline to maintain consistency and completeness.

Essential Components of Every Session Note​

Regardless of format, certain elements must appear in every ABA session note:

Client Identification​

  • Full legal name: Match insurance records exactly
  • Date of birth: Distinguishes clients with similar names
  • Client ID number: If your system uses unique identifiers
  • Diagnosis code: Typically F84.0 for autism spectrum disorder

Session Details​

ElementExampleWhy It Matters
Date of serviceJanuary 15, 2026Links note to specific billing date
Start time3:30 PMSupports unit calculation
End time5:30 PMConfirms session duration
Total duration120 minutes (8 units)Must match billed units
LocationClient's homeAffects reimbursement rates
CPT code97153Identifies service type

Provider Information​

  • RBT name and credentials: Your full name and "RBT" designation
  • Signature: Electronic or physical
  • Supervising BCBA: Name and credentials of your supervisor

Clinical Content​

  • Goals addressed: Specific treatment plan goals targeted
  • Interventions used: ABA techniques and strategies implemented
  • Data collected: Quantitative measures of performance
  • Client response: How the client performed and behaved
  • Caregiver involvement: If applicable, note caregiver participation
  • Next session plans: What will be targeted next

Writing Objective, Behavioral Descriptions​

The most common session note error is using subjective language instead of objective, behavioral descriptions. This distinction is fundamental to ABA practice and documentation.

Subjective vs. Objective Language​

Subjective language describes internal states, makes assumptions, or uses vague terms:

  • "Client was angry"
  • "Client seemed frustrated"
  • "Client had a bad day"
  • "Client was uncooperative"
  • "Session went well"

Objective language describes observable, measurable behaviors that any observer could identify:

  • "Client engaged in 3 instances of hitting (closed fist contact with another person)"
  • "Client turned away from materials and stated 'no' 5 times during demand presentation"
  • "Client exhibited facial flushing, increased vocal volume, and rapid breathing"
  • "Client completed 18/20 trials correctly (90% accuracy)"

The Video Test​

Ask yourself: "If someone watched a video of this session, would they see exactly what I've described?"

If yes, your description is objective. If no, revise to describe only what could be observed.

Behavior Description Examples​

Subjective (Avoid)Objective (Use Instead)
"Client was happy""Client smiled, laughed, and engaged in appropriate vocalizations during play activity"
"Client was tired""Client yawned 4 times, laid head on table twice, and response latency increased to 8+ seconds"
"Client was aggressive""Client hit therapist with open palm 2 times and kicked toward therapist's leg 1 time"
"Client didn't want to work""Client engaged in 6 instances of task refusal (pushing materials away, turning body away from table)"
"Good session""Client met criterion on 3/4 targeted goals with 80%+ accuracy"

Using Operational Definitions​

When documenting behaviors, use the operational definitions from the client's treatment plan or Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP). These definitions ensure everyone measures and describes behaviors the same way.

Example operational definition: "Physical aggression is defined as any instance of hitting (contact with another person using a closed or open hand), kicking (contact using foot), biting (teeth contact with another person's skin), or scratching (dragging fingernails across another person's skin with sufficient force to leave a mark)."

When documenting, reference this definition: "Client engaged in 2 instances of physical aggression (hitting with open hand) during transition to work area."

Data Documentation Best Practices​

ABA is data-driven, and session notes must include quantitative data that demonstrates progress toward treatment goals.

Types of Data to Document​

Data TypeBest ForExampleWhen to Use
Frequency/CountDiscrete behaviors with clear start/end"15 requests made"Manding, aggression instances, task completion
PercentagePerformance across trials"85% correct (17/20)"Skill acquisition, accuracy measurement
DurationBehaviors that persist over time"Tantrum lasted 4:30"Tantrums, engagement, on-task behavior
LatencyTime between cue and response"3-second average response"Following directions, transitions
Trial-by-trialDetailed learning analysis"Trial 1: Correct, Trial 2: Incorrect"DTT programs, error pattern analysis

Frequency/count data: How many times a behavior occurred

  • "Client made 15 independent requests during the session"
  • "3 instances of self-injurious behavior observed"

Percentage data: Proportion of opportunities with correct responses

  • "Client demonstrated 85% accuracy (17/20 correct) on color identification"
  • "Client followed 2-step directions correctly on 70% of opportunities (7/10)"

Duration data: How long a behavior lasted

  • "Tantrum duration: 4 minutes, 30 seconds"
  • "Client engaged in independent play for 12 consecutive minutes"

Latency data: Time between instruction and response

  • "Average response latency: 3 seconds"
  • "Time to initiate transition: 15 seconds from first prompt"

Trial-by-trial data: Individual trial outcomes

  • "Trial 1: Correct (independent), Trial 2: Incorrect, Trial 3: Correct (gestural prompt)"

Connecting Data to Goals​

Every data point should connect to a specific treatment plan goal:

Weak: "Client did well with requesting today."

Strong: "Targeted Goal 2.1: Client will independently mand for preferred items using 2-3 word phrases in 80% of opportunities. Today's performance: 15/20 independent mands (75%), 5/20 prompted mands. Current trend shows improvement from baseline of 30%."

Data-Narrative Consistency​

A common audit flag is misalignment between narrative descriptions and reported data. If your narrative says "minimal progress" but your data shows 85% accuracy, reviewers will question the documentation.

Ensure your narrative interpretation matches your quantitative data:

Data ShowsNarrative Should Say
90% accuracy"Client demonstrated strong performance"
50% accuracy"Performance at chance level"
30% accuracy"Client continues to require significant support"
Increase from 40% to 70%"Notable improvement observed"
Decrease from 80% to 60%"Performance decline noted; will review intervention"

Session Note Examples​

SOAP Note Example​

Client: John Smith, DOB: 05/15/2019 Date of Service: January 15, 2026 Time: 3:30 PM - 5:30 PM (120 minutes, 8 units) Location: Client's home CPT Code: 97153 Provider: Jane Doe, RBT | Supervisor: Dr. Sarah Johnson, BCBA

S (Subjective): Caregiver reported that John had a restless night with approximately 5 hours of sleep. Caregiver stated John refused breakfast this morning. Caregiver expressed concern about upcoming school transition.

O (Objective): Session targeted Treatment Plan Goals 1.2 (receptive identification), 2.1 (manding), and 4.3 (transition tolerance).

Receptive Identification (Goal 1.2): Conducted 30 discrete trials targeting receptive identification of common objects. John demonstrated 83% accuracy (25/30 correct). Error pattern: Consistently confused "cup" and "bowl." Implemented error correction procedure (model-lead-test) for errors.

Manding (Goal 2.1): John produced 18 independent mands using 2-3 word phrases (e.g., "want crackers," "more bubbles") and 4 prompted mands requiring gestural prompt. Total: 18/22 independent (82%). Target mastery criterion: 80% across 3 sessions.

Transition Tolerance (Goal 4.3): John transitioned between 6 activities during session. 4 transitions completed without problem behavior. 2 transitions (preferred to non-preferred activity) resulted in verbal protest (crying, stating "no") lasting approximately 45 seconds each. No physical aggression observed. Transition warning and visual timer strategies implemented.

Challenging Behaviors: 2 instances of verbal protest during transitions (described above). 0 instances of physical aggression. 1 instance of self-stimulatory behavior (hand flapping) during waiting period, lasting approximately 30 seconds.

A (Assessment): John's receptive identification performance continues to improve (baseline: 60%, current: 83%). The cup/bowl confusion suggests additional discrimination training is needed. Manding performance meets mastery criterion for second consecutive session—recommend advancing to 3-4 word phrases. Transition difficulties appear correlated with sleep quality; today's challenges were mild compared to well-rested sessions. Visual supports are helping reduce transition-related behaviors.

P (Plan):

  • Continue receptive identification training with increased cup/bowl discrimination trials
  • If manding maintains 80%+ next session, advance to 3-4 word phrase targets
  • Continue transition warning and visual timer strategies
  • Discuss sleep correlation with BCBA for possible parent training focus
  • Next session: Wednesday, January 17, 3:30 PM

BIRP Note Example​

Client: Maria Garcia, DOB: 03/22/2020 Date of Service: January 15, 2026 Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM (120 minutes, 8 units) Location: ABC ABA Clinic CPT Code: 97153 Provider: Michael Chen, RBT | Supervisor**: Dr. Lisa Wong, BCBA

B (Behavior): Target Behaviors Addressed:

  • Social greetings (Goal 3.1): Maria responded to greetings from 3 different staff members. Responded to "Hi Maria" with appropriate reciprocal greeting ("Hi [name]") on 2/3 opportunities (67%).
  • Turn-taking (Goal 3.4): During board game activity, Maria waited for her turn on 8/10 opportunities (80%). On 2 occasions, Maria reached for game pieces during peer's turn; responded to verbal redirection immediately.
  • Emotion identification (Goal 5.2): Maria correctly identified emotions in picture cards on 14/20 trials (70%). Errors primarily involved confusing "surprised" with "scared."

Challenging Behaviors:

  • Elopement: 0 instances
  • Vocal stereotypy: Present during 3 transition periods, approximately 15-20 seconds per occurrence. Did not interfere with task engagement once redirected.
  • Task refusal: 1 instance during emotion identification activity (pushed cards away). Responded to choice-making intervention and resumed task.

I (Intervention):

  • Discrete trial training (DTT) for emotion identification using errorless learning with 0-second prompt delay, most-to-least prompt fading
  • Natural environment teaching (NET) during board game for turn-taking targets
  • Social skills training using role-play and in-vivo practice for greeting responses
  • Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) for vocal stereotypy—reinforced appropriate verbal communication during transitions
  • Choice-making intervention for task refusal—offered choice between two emotion card sets

R (Response): Maria demonstrated improved social greeting performance compared to last week (50% → 67%). Turn-taking at 80% meets the mastery criterion; this is the second consecutive session at criterion. Emotion identification showing steady progress (baseline 45%, current 70%). Maria responded well to choice-making intervention, independently selecting preferred card set and completing remaining trials. Vocal stereotypy remained low-intensity and brief.

P (Plan):

  • Advance turn-taking to more complex games with longer wait times
  • Add "confused" emotion to identification targets next session
  • Continue social greeting training with novel communication partners
  • Discuss with BCBA: Consider adding community generalization for greeting targets
  • Next session: January 17, 10:00 AM

Common Session Note Errors​

Avoiding these frequent mistakes improves documentation quality and reduces claim denials.

Error 1: Vague, Subjective Language​

Wrong: "Client had a good session and was cooperative."

Right: "Client completed 25/30 discrete trials with 83% accuracy. Client followed RBT instructions on 95% of opportunities (19/20) and required only 1 verbal prompt to return to work area."

Error 2: Missing Data​

Wrong: "Client worked on receptive identification and did okay."

Right: "Targeted receptive identification of colors (Goal 1.3). Client demonstrated 70% accuracy (14/20 correct). Errors: 4 errors on 'purple' trials, 2 errors on 'orange' trials."

Error 3: Data-Narrative Mismatch​

Wrong: "Client showed minimal progress on requesting goals." [Data shows 85% accuracy]

Right: "Client demonstrated strong performance on requesting goals with 85% accuracy (17/20 independent mands), exceeding the 80% mastery criterion."

Wrong: "Played games with client for 30 minutes."

Right: "Implemented board game activity to target Treatment Plan Goal 3.4 (turn-taking in social play). Activity provided structured opportunities for waiting, requesting turns, and tolerating peer interactions. Client demonstrated turn-taking on 8/10 opportunities (80%)."

Error 5: Incomplete Metadata​

Wrong: Missing start time, end time, or location

Right: Always include complete date, start time, end time, duration, location, and CPT code. Double-check before submitting.

Error 6: Copy-Paste Errors​

Wrong: Copying previous notes and forgetting to update dates, data, or observations

Right: If using templates, create a checklist of fields that must be updated: date, times, specific data values, narrative descriptions. Better yet, start fresh with blank templates.

Error 7: Late Documentation​

Wrong: Completing session notes 3-4 days after the session

Right: Complete notes within 24 hours. Best practice: allocate the final 5-10 minutes of each session for documentation while details are fresh.

The 24-Hour Documentation Rule

Best practice: Complete session notes the same day as the session.

Why it matters:

  • Memory accuracy declines rapidly after 24 hours
  • Notes entered days later can be flagged as potentially fabricated during audits
  • Real-time data collection ensures accuracy
  • Most payers require notes within 24-48 hours; some require same-day

Tip: Block the last 5-10 minutes of each session specifically for note completion.

Error 8: Informal Language​

Wrong: "Client was super hyper today and totally didn't want to do anything lol"

Right: "Client exhibited elevated activity level including running in the therapy room (3 instances), difficulty maintaining seated position (stood up from chair 8 times), and increased response latency (average 6 seconds vs. typical 2 seconds). Client engaged in task refusal behaviors on 4/10 demand presentations."

Error 9: Missing Caregiver Information​

Wrong: [No mention of caregiver when session was in home]

Right: "Caregiver (mother) present for final 20 minutes of session. Reviewed data collection procedures for home practice. Caregiver demonstrated correct implementation of prompting hierarchy on 4/5 trials (80% fidelity)."

Error 10: No Forward Planning​

Wrong: [Note ends with data without indicating next steps]

Right: "Next session will continue current targets. Will introduce new prompt fading step for receptive identification if client maintains 80%+ accuracy. Will discuss transition data with BCBA during supervision."

SOAP Notes for ABA​

SOAP notes provide a structured medical-model format that many payers and organizations prefer.

Subjective Section Tips​

The Subjective section captures information reported by others—not your observations:

Include:

  • Caregiver reports about behavior at home or school
  • Client self-reports (if verbal)
  • Teacher or other provider communications
  • Changes in routine, sleep, medication, or life events

Format examples:

  • "Caregiver reported client slept only 4 hours last night."
  • "Teacher sent note indicating client had difficulty in morning circle time."
  • "Client stated 'I don't want to work' upon arrival."
  • "No caregiver concerns reported today."

Objective Section Tips​

The Objective section is your data-rich description of what occurred:

Include:

  • Goals targeted with specific performance data
  • Interventions implemented with fidelity
  • Challenging behaviors observed (frequency, duration, intensity)
  • Antecedent-behavior-consequence information for notable incidents

Structure suggestion: Organize by goal, providing intervention and data for each.

Assessment Section Tips​

The Assessment section is your professional interpretation:

Include:

  • Progress analysis (improving, stable, declining)
  • Pattern identification
  • Hypothesis about factors affecting performance
  • Comparison to baseline or previous sessions

Avoid: This is not the place for extensive subjective language—keep interpretations tied to data.

Plan Section Tips​

The Plan section outlines next steps:

Include:

  • What will be targeted next session
  • Any modifications to current approaches
  • Items to discuss with BCBA supervisor
  • Recommendations for caregiver follow-up
  • Next session date/time if known

BIRP Notes for ABA​

BIRP notes align naturally with ABA's emphasis on the behavior-intervention relationship.

Behavior Section Tips​

Document both target behaviors and challenging behaviors:

Target behaviors: Skills being taught, current performance levels Challenging behaviors: Problem behaviors observed, with operational definitions

Intervention Section Tips​

Detail the specific ABA techniques used:

  • Teaching procedures (DTT, NET, incidental teaching)
  • Prompting strategies (hierarchy used, prompt fading)
  • Reinforcement procedures (what reinforcers, what schedule)
  • Behavior reduction procedures (DRA, DRO, extinction)
  • Crisis/safety procedures if applicable

Response Section Tips​

Document how the client responded to your interventions:

  • Quantitative data (percentages, frequencies, durations)
  • Qualitative observations about engagement and participation
  • Effectiveness of specific strategies

Plan Section Tips​

Similar to SOAP—outline next steps, modifications, and follow-up needs.

Time Management for Documentation​

Documentation time often extends beyond paid hours, contributing to burnout. Efficient practices help manage this burden.

Same-Day Documentation​

Complete session notes the same day as the session:

Benefits:

  • Better accuracy while details are fresh
  • Reduced cognitive load from remembering multiple sessions
  • Lower risk of conflating details between clients
  • Compliance with payer timelines

Strategies:

  • Allocate the final 5-10 minutes of each session for documentation
  • Use voice-to-text for initial drafts
  • Complete data entry during natural breaks in sessions
  • Set daily documentation deadlines (e.g., all notes done by 7 PM)

Batch Processing vs. Real-Time​

Real-time documentation (during or immediately after sessions):

  • Most accurate
  • Prevents backlog
  • May feel rushed

Batch processing (designated documentation blocks):

  • Allows focused attention
  • Risk of memory decay
  • Can create overwhelming backlog if delayed

Hybrid approach: Capture essential data in real-time, flesh out narrative descriptions in a designated block at day's end.

Template Usage​

Templates reduce documentation time while ensuring completeness:

Template benefits:

  • Pre-populated fields (client name, DOB, diagnosis, goals)
  • Consistent structure across notes
  • Built-in prompts for required elements
  • Reduced cognitive load

Template risks:

  • Copy-paste errors if not careful
  • May create generic-sounding notes
  • Must still customize for each session

Technology Tools​

Modern ABA practices use technology to streamline documentation:

Practice management systems: Many include session note templates and automated reminders Mobile apps: Allow real-time data entry during sessions Voice dictation: Speeds initial note drafting AI-powered tools: Instafill.ai and similar tools can pre-populate forms with client information, reducing manual entry time

Session Note Templates​

Below are templates you can adapt for your practice. Customize fields based on your organization's requirements and payer expectations.

Basic Session Note Template​

CLIENT INFORMATION
Name: _______________
DOB: _______________
Diagnosis: F84.0 (Autism Spectrum Disorder)

SESSION DETAILS
Date: _______________
Start Time: _______________
End Time: _______________
Duration: _______________ minutes (___ units)
Location: ☐ Home ☐ Clinic ☐ School ☐ Community ☐ Telehealth
CPT Code: ☐ 97153 ☐ 97155 ☐ 97156

PROVIDER INFORMATION
RBT Name: _______________
Supervising BCBA: _______________

CAREGIVER REPORT/SUBJECTIVE INFORMATION
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________

GOALS ADDRESSED & DATA

Goal 1: _______________
Intervention: _______________
Data: ___/___  (___%)
Notes: _______________

Goal 2: _______________
Intervention: _______________
Data: ___/___  (___%)
Notes: _______________

Goal 3: _______________
Intervention: _______________
Data: ___/___  (___%)
Notes: _______________

CHALLENGING BEHAVIORS
Behavior: _______________
Frequency/Duration: _______________
Antecedent: _______________
Consequence/Intervention: _______________

ASSESSMENT/CLINICAL INTERPRETATION
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________

PLAN/NEXT STEPS
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________

Provider Signature: _______________ Date: _______________

SOAP Note Template​

CLIENT: _______________ DOB: _______________
DATE: _______________ TIME: _______________ to _______________
LOCATION: _______________ CPT CODE: _______________
PROVIDER: _______________, RBT SUPERVISOR: _______________, BCBA

S (SUBJECTIVE):
Caregiver/client reports: _______________________________________________
Relevant background information: _______________________________________

O (OBJECTIVE):
Goals Targeted:
1. Goal: _______________
   Intervention: _______________
   Performance: ___/___  (___%)

2. Goal: _______________
   Intervention: _______________
   Performance: ___/___  (___%)

Challenging Behaviors:
- Behavior: _______________
  Frequency: ___ Duration: ___ Intensity: ___

A (ASSESSMENT):
Progress analysis: _______________________________________________
Pattern observations: _______________________________________________

P (PLAN):
Next session targets: _______________________________________________
Modifications: _______________________________________________
BCBA consultation needs: _______________________________________________

Signature: _______________ Date: _______________

Session notes may seem routine, but they're the foundation of ABA documentation. Every note you write contributes to your client's clinical record, supports billing and reimbursement, and demonstrates the quality of services you provide. By mastering objective language, incorporating meaningful data, and implementing efficient documentation practices, you ensure that your session notes serve their clinical and administrative purposes effectively.

The documentation burden is real, but so are the solutions. Whether through better templates, time management strategies, or technology tools, investing in your session note practices pays dividends in reduced denials, better clinical continuity, and more time for what matters most—helping your clients progress.